tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3505897869747553967.post3783645288990013489..comments2024-03-24T07:41:59.386-07:00Comments on 3D Stereoscopic Photography: Case Study - DMAG5/DMAG9b vs DMAG5b/DMAG9bUgo Capeto 3Dhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06208931949010344741noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3505897869747553967.post-68712064227042858332019-05-13T05:03:13.356-07:002019-05-13T05:03:13.356-07:00Why do you need to generate the depth map with DMA...Why do you need to generate the depth map with DMAG5 when you can already extract the depth map from the dual camera iphone?Ugo Capeto 3Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06208931949010344741noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3505897869747553967.post-70974100061159357412019-05-13T05:01:50.821-07:002019-05-13T05:01:50.821-07:00If the baseline is small, you should be able to us...If the baseline is small, you should be able to use DMAG5b instead of DMAG5. I don't think you even need to run DMAG9b afterwards. That certainly seems to be the case for this particular photo pair.Ugo Capeto 3Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06208931949010344741noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3505897869747553967.post-47449652495854813892019-05-13T01:23:39.875-07:002019-05-13T01:23:39.875-07:00Thank you Ugo Capeto for the post related to my po...Thank you Ugo Capeto for the post related to my portrait photo.<br />As I have been using mainly DMAG5, I learned a lot about others but I could notice no distinct difference among DMAG versions in the final anaglyph 3D & FB3D photos. Could you kindly recommend which version may be adequate for my iPhone depth map based stereoscopic 3D FB3D posts? Thank you in advance.inouek3d@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13857092730846617499noreply@blogger.com